Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join Us
Site Search
Legal Flash
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (890) posts »
 

Justices Seem Split in Case on Birth Control Mandate

Posted By Administration, Thursday, March 24, 2016

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court weighed moral theology and parsed insurance terminology on Wednesday in an extended and animated argument that seemed to leave the justices sharply divided over what the government may do to require employers to provide free insurance coverage for contraception to female workers.

A 4-to-4 tie appeared to be a real possibility, which would automatically affirm the four appeals court decisions under review.

All four ruled that religious groups seeking to opt out of the requirement that they pay for the coverage must sign forms and provide information that would shift the cost to insurance companies and the government. A tie vote in the Supreme Court would not set a national precedent, and religious groups in different parts of the country would have conflicting obligations if they object to covering contraception.

Read the whole story at NY Times

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
Permalink | Comments (0)
 
more Calendar

11/30/2017
Real Property Section’s Fall Fine Wine Mixer

12/1/2017
2017 Annual Family Law Holiday Luncheon

12/7/2017
2017 Annual Women Lawyers' Holiday Lunch

Recent Recognitions
Mariel BlockBarrister of the Year 2016
Ruth Silver TaubePro Bono Award, 2016

Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal