Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join Us
Site Search
Legal Flash
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (858) posts »
 

Justices Seem Split in Case on Birth Control Mandate

Posted By Administration, Thursday, March 24, 2016

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court weighed moral theology and parsed insurance terminology on Wednesday in an extended and animated argument that seemed to leave the justices sharply divided over what the government may do to require employers to provide free insurance coverage for contraception to female workers.

A 4-to-4 tie appeared to be a real possibility, which would automatically affirm the four appeals court decisions under review.

All four ruled that religious groups seeking to opt out of the requirement that they pay for the coverage must sign forms and provide information that would shift the cost to insurance companies and the government. A tie vote in the Supreme Court would not set a national precedent, and religious groups in different parts of the country would have conflicting obligations if they object to covering contraception.

Read the whole story at NY Times

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
Permalink | Comments (0)
 
more Calendar

9/28/2017
Trade Secrets: How to Avoid Ending Up In Court & What To Do Once You’re There

10/4/2017
Indemnity Agreements: The Great and the Not So Great

10/6/2017
[2 in 1] Business Income Available for Support & Evidence Hot Topics

Recent Recognitions
Nora V. Frimann2016 Professional Lawyer of the Year
Richard KondaProfessional Lawyer of the Year 2015

Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal