Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join Us
Site Search
Legal Flash
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (729) posts »
 

Judge Allows Moral, Not Just Religious, Contraception Exemptions

Posted By Administration, Wednesday, September 02, 2015

Employers do not need to provide insurance coverage for contraception even if their objections are moral rather than religious, a federal judge here ruled on Monday.

The case concerned a group called March for Life, which was formed after the Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to abortion in 1973 inRoe v. Wade. The group, Monday’s decision said, “is a nonprofit, nonreligious pro-life organization.”

It opposes methods of contraception that it says can amount to abortion, including hormonal products, intrauterine devices and emergency contraceptives. Many scientists disagree that those methods of contraception are equivalent to abortion.

Read the whole story at The New York Times

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
Permalink | Comments (0)
 
more Calendar

9/27/2016
Securing Your Business: Cyber Security Basics for Small to Medium Law Firms

9/28/2016
2016 Annual Reception Honoring Santa Clara County Women Judges

10/4/2016
Everything You Need to Know About Preliminary Declarations of Disclosure But Were Afraid to Ask

Recent Recognitions
Mariel BlockBarrister of the Year 2016
Richard KondaProfessional Lawyer of the Year 2015

Membership Software Powered by YourMembership.com®  ::  Legal