Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join Us
Site Search
Legal Flash
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (760) posts »
 

Judge Allows Moral, Not Just Religious, Contraception Exemptions

Posted By Administration, Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Employers do not need to provide insurance coverage for contraception even if their objections are moral rather than religious, a federal judge here ruled on Monday.

The case concerned a group called March for Life, which was formed after the Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to abortion in 1973 inRoe v. Wade. The group, Monday’s decision said, “is a nonprofit, nonreligious pro-life organization.”

It opposes methods of contraception that it says can amount to abortion, including hormonal products, intrauterine devices and emergency contraceptives. Many scientists disagree that those methods of contraception are equivalent to abortion.

Read the whole story at The New York Times

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
Permalink | Comments (0)
 
more Calendar

12/12/2016
Insurance Essentials from A to Z for Litigation and Transactional Attorneys

12/13/2016
The Ins and Outs of Equity Compensation: Stock Options, RSUs and ESPP

12/15/2016
Barristers' Holiday Mixer

Recent Recognitions
Richard KondaProfessional Lawyer of the Year 2015
Mariel BlockBarrister of the Year 2016

Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal